User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.5; zh-CN; GT-I9100) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.6.1.401 U2/1.0.0 Mobile

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 9.6U2 Android 2.3SamsungGalaxy S IIMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.6 Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.1closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungGT-I9100closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.6Gecko Android 2.3.5SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I9100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:32 | by ThaDafinser