User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-gb; LIFETAB_E10312 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30 GSA/3.4.16.1149292.arm

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2MedionLifeTab E10312Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2MedionLifetab E10312tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2MedionLifetab E10312closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Google Search 3.4.16Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2MedionLifetab E10312tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2MedionE10312 (MD 98486)Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:34 | by ThaDafinser