User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android v1.02_14.13-CH-2011.01.13; xx; ONDA_VI10 Build/ECLAIR) UC AppleWebKit/530 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/530

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android OndaGALAXY Tab S 8.4" LTEsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser Webkit 530Aliyun OS 1.02OndaVI10tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:34 | by ThaDafinser