User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; en-gb; SAMSUNG SM-T705 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1.5 Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 1.5Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungGALAXY Tab S 8.4" LTEtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.4.2SamsungSM-T705closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser 1.5Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2SamsungGalaxy Tab S 8.4tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 28closeAndroid 4.4SamsungSM-T705Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:34 | by ThaDafinser