User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS armv7l 3428.149.2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.87 Safari/537.22

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 25.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 25.0WebKit Chrome OS 3428.149desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeChrome OS 25.0.1364.87closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeChrome OS 3428.149.2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:34 | by ThaDafinser