User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; zh-cn;GiONEE-GN705W/GN705W Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit534.30(KHTML,like Gecko)Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 Id/8A69B3BBB1C1C7B43BCCA45AA630913B RV/4.2.0 GNBR/1.6.1.aw (securitypay,securityinstalled)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2GioneeGN705Wsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.1closeAndroid 4.2.1GioneeGN705Wcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Android 4.0.4GioneeGN705Wmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:36 | by ThaDafinser