User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 8_3 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/35.0.1916.41 Mobile/12F69 Safari/9537.53

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0WebKit iOS 8.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.41closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile iOS 35.0WebKit iOS 8.3AppleiPadtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.41closeiOS 8.3closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile iOS 35.0.1916closeiOS 8.3AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Webkit 537.51.1iOS 8.3AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.41closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile on iOS 35closeiOS 8.3AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:36 | by ThaDafinser