User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; Series60/5.2 Nokia500/010.029; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) NokiaBrowser/7.3.1.37 Mobile Safari/533.4 3gpp-gba

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Nokia Browser 7.3WebKit SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia Browser 7.3WebKit Symbian^3 AnnaNokia500smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 010.029;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.3.1closeSymbian^3 Anna Nokia500closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Nokia Browser 7.3.1Webkit 533.4Series60 5.2Nokia500mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser 7.3closeSymbian ^3Nokia500Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:39 | by ThaDafinser