User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.6; Linux; X11; x86_64; xx) KHTML/4.6.5 (like Gecko) Mageia/4.6.5-1.7.mga1

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Konqueror 4.6KHTML 4.6Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Konqueror 4.6KHTML GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.6;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.6closeMageia closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Konqueror 4.6KHTML 4.6.5Mageia 1desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeFreeBSD Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:39 | by ThaDafinser