User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Mandriva Linux/1.9.2.17-0.1mdv2010.0 (2010.0) Firefox/3.6.17

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Firefox 3.6Gecko Mandriva 1.9desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.17closeMandriva 2010.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Firefox 3.6.17Gecko 1.9.2Mandriva 2010desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:43 | by ThaDafinser