User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; SAMSUNG-GT-S3850) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.5 SamsungGT-S3850smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close SamsungGT-S3850closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Touchwiz SamsungCorby IImobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close SamsungGT-S3850Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:43 | by ThaDafinser