User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;4.2.2;Zh_cn;GT-I9300-JB2;720*1280;)UCWEB7.6.0.75/139/999

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 7.6 GNU/Linux SamsungGALAXY S IIIsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.6.0closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-I9300-JB2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 7.6 Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy S IIImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:44 | by ThaDafinser