User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-C3322i Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux zvav; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 11.10Presto GNU/Linux SamsungGT-C3322ismartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10closeLinux SamsungGT-C3322icloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mini Presto 2.8.119 SamsungGT-C3322imobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux SamsungGT-C3322iFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:48 | by ThaDafinser