User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
SeaMonkey 2.1Gecko MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
SeaMonkey 2.1Gecko Mac 10.6desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.1closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.1closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
SeaMonkey 2.1Gecko 2.0.1Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:49 | by ThaDafinser