User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 3912.101.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.116 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 27.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 27.0WebKit Chrome OS 3912.101desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeChrome OS 27.0.1453.116closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeChrome OS 3912.101.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 27Blink 537.36Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:55 | by ThaDafinser