User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux sh4; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (;;;;;); CE-HTML; TechniSat DigiCorder ISIO C; xx) Presto/2.9.167 Version/11.50

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 11.50Presto GNU/Linux TechniSatDigiCorder ISIO Ctv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux TechniSatDigiCorder ISIO Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 3.1Presto 2.9.167 TechniSatDigiCorder ISIO Ctelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:56 | by ThaDafinser