User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; fr-fr; Garmin-Asus A50 Build/ERE27) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17; A50-V5.0.68-user-20101020

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1Garmin-AsusA50Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1Garmin-AsusA50smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1.0Garmin-AsusA50closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1Garmin-AsusNuvifone A50mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Garmin-AsusA50Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:57 | by ThaDafinser