User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0; E5533 Build/29.0.B.0.161) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.94 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 45.0Blink Android 5.0smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeAndroid 5.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 45.0.2454closeAndroid 5.0SonyEricssonE5533closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 45Blink 537.36Android 5.0SonyXperia C5 Ultra dualmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 45closeAndroid 5.0SonyE5533Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:58 | by ThaDafinser