User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; LIFETAB_P9514 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0MedionLifeTab P9514Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0MedionLifetab P9514tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.0.3MedionLifetab P9514closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 31Blink 537.36Android 4.0.3MedionLifetab P9514tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0LifetabP9514Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:58 | by ThaDafinser