User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 5020A Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.116 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1437.74904

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 21.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 21.0.1437.74904closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 21.0Blink Android 4.1AlcatelOne Touch 5020Asmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 21.0.1437.74904closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 21.0.1437closeAndroid 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch 5020Acloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 21.0Blink 537.36Android 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch M'Popmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 21.0.1437.74904closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 21closeAndroid 4.1AlcatelOT-5020ASmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:59 | by ThaDafinser