User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; NETRANGEMMH; Sharp; HbbTV/1.1.1; CE-HTML/1.0; LE542E; FT; LC:deu; CC:che;; en) Presto/2.9.167 Version/11.50

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 11.50Presto GNU/Linux SharpLE542Etv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.50closeLinux LE542E;FTcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 3.1Presto 2.9.167 televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:01 | by ThaDafinser