User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mipsel; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; TOSHIBA; DTV_RL953; 56.7.66.7; t12; ) ; ToshibaTP/1.3.0 (+VIDEO_MP4+VIDEO_X_MS_ASF+AUDIO_MPEG+AUDIO_MP4+DRM+NATIVELAUNCH) ; en) AppleWebKit/534.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
GNU/Linux ToshibaDTV RL953tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux TOSHIBADTV_RL953closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 534.1 ToshibaRegza RL953 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:01 | by ThaDafinser