User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11) PPC; 240x320; HTC_Touch_Viva_T2223; OpVer 86.157.15.753

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 7.11Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 7.11Trident Windows CE HTCTouch Viva T2223smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows CE HTCTouch Viva T2223closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.1HTCTouch Vivamobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCHTC Touch Viva T2223Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:02 | by ThaDafinser