User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; Discovery DG500 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.2DoogeeDiscovery DG500smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.1Discovery DG500closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 34Blink 537.36Android 4.2.1DoogeeDiscovery DG500mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.2DOOGEEDiscovery DG500Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:02 | by ThaDafinser