User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.52 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 28.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.52closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 28.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.52closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 28Blink 537.36Linux desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.52closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 28.0.1500.45closeOpenBSD amd64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:03 | by ThaDafinser