User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 10.0; Android 4.2.1; Microsoft; Lumia 535 Dual SIM) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.135 Mobile Safari/537.36 Edge/12.10166

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Edge Mobile 12.0Edge 12.0WinPhone10 10.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 12.10166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Microsoft Edge 12.10166Edge Windows Phone 10.0NokiaLumia 535smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 12.10166closeChrome OS 42.0.2311.135closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Edge Mobile 12.10166closeWindows Phone 10.0NokiaLumia 535closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Edge 12 EdgeHTML 12Windows Phone 10.0MicrosoftLumia 535mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Edge 12.10166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2NokiaLumia 535 Dual SimSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:04 | by ThaDafinser