User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.3; KFSOWI Build/KTU84M) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.59 Safari/537.36 OPR/26.0.1656.87080

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 26.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 26.0.1656.87080closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 26.0Blink Android 4.4AmazonKindle Fire HD 7" WiFitabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 26.0.1656.87080closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 26.0.1656closeAndroid 4.4.3AmazonKindle Fire HD 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 26.0Blink 537.36FireOS 4.5AmazonKindle Fire HD (2013)tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 26.0.1656.87080closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.4closeAndroid 4.4AmazonKFSOWITabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:07 | by ThaDafinser