User agent detail

HTC_Touch_Diamond2_T5353 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.7.1.88

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 7.7WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 7.7 Windows CE HTCTouch Diamond2 T5353smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.7.1closeWindows CE HTCTouch_Diamond2_T5353closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 7.7Gecko Windows Mobile HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCT5353Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:08 | by ThaDafinser