User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; MB870 Build/4.5.1A-DTN-130) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.33 Mobile Safari/537.22

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.33closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.0MotorolaMB870smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.33closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaMB870closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4MotorolaDroid X2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.33closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.0MotorolaSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:11 | by ThaDafinser