User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 17.0; GT-S7580 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.93 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 43.0Blink Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 43.0Blink Android 17.0SamsungGALAXY Trend Plussmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 17.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 17.0SamsungGT-S7580closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 43Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Trend Plusmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:11 | by ThaDafinser