User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; XT1562 Build/LPD23.118-10) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.111 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 5.1MotorolaXT1562smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 5.1.1MotorolaXT1562closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 42Blink 537.36Android 5.1.1MotorolaMoto X Playmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 5.1MotorolaXT1562Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:12 | by ThaDafinser