User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; LG-H540 Build/LRX22G) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 5.0LGH540smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 5.0.2LGH540closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser Blink 537.36Android 5.0.2LGG4 Stylusmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.0LGH540Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:12 | by ThaDafinser