User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LG-E410 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.1LGE410smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.1.2LGE410closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink 537.36Android 4.1.2LGOptimus L1 IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.1LGE410Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:12 | by ThaDafinser