User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.1-update1; xx; C8500; 240*320) UCWEB8.2.2.135/145/800

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.2 GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.2closeAndroid 2.1.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.2 Android 2.1HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:14 | by ThaDafinser