User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Comodo_Dragon/17.1.0.0 Chrome/17.0.963.38 Safari/535.11

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Dragon 17.1WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.38closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Comodo Dragon 17.1WebKit Windows 7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.38closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Comodo Dragon 17.1.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Comodo Dragon 17.1Webkit 535.11Windows 7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.38closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:14 | by ThaDafinser