User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2101.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1592.0 (Edition Developer)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 25.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1592.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 25.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1592.0closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1592closeMac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Developer 25.0Blink 537.36OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1592.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.11closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:15 | by ThaDafinser