User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) GSA/3.2.1.25875 Mobile/10A551 Safari/8536.25

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Google App 3.2WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8536.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Google Search Appliance 3.2.1.25875closeiOS 6.0.2closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 6.0.2closeiOS 6.0.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Google Search 3.2.1Webkit 536.26iOS 6.0.2AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:15 | by ThaDafinser