User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LG-F160L Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.23 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.23closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.1LGF160Lsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.23closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.1.2LGF160Lcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 32Blink 537.36Android 4.1.2LGOptimus LTE IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.23closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 32closeAndroid 4.1LGF160LSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:17 | by ThaDafinser