User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64; U; ja) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.52

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 11.52Presto 2.9FreeBSD Desktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.52closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 11.52Presto FreeBSD 8.2desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.52closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.52closeFreeBSD 8.2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 11.52Presto 2.9.168FreeBSD 8.2desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.52closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.00closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:17 | by ThaDafinser