User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; ja-jp) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8C148

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 4.2AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.17.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 4.2AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 4.2.1closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 533.17.9iOS 4.2.1AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.2.1closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:18 | by ThaDafinser