User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:20.0) Gecko/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17a1

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
SeaMonkey 2.17Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
SeaMonkey 2.17Gecko Windows XPdesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.17a1closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.17.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
SeaMonkey 2.17a1Gecko 20.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:22 | by ThaDafinser