User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; SM-G360BT Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.135 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 36.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungSM-G360BTsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 36.0.1985closeAndroid 4.4.4SamsungSM-G360BTcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 36Blink 537.36Android 4.4.4SamsungGalaxy Win 2 Duos TVmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 36closeAndroid 4.4SamsungSM-G360BTSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:22 | by ThaDafinser