User agent detail

LG_TB200_CMCC A2000pH/2.32.00 Release/9.14.2009 Browser/Teleca/Q7.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Obigo LGXperia Zsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Obigo Q 7.1 LGTB200mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:23 | by ThaDafinser