User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian; U; E7-00; xx) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11A465 Safari/9537.53//1.40 Mobile Safari/534.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 7.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari 7.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0NokiaE7-00closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 534.3Series60 NokiaE7-00mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0.4closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:24 | by ThaDafinser