User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Unknown; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/537.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.1+ LG Browser/6.00.00(+mouse+3D+SCREEN+TUNER; LGE; 47LA6900-NA; 04.00.33; 0x00000001;); LG NetCast.TV-2013 /04.00.33 (LG, 47LA6900-NA, wired)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 537.1closeLinux LG47LA6900-NAcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser 6.00Webkit 537.1 LGLA6900 NetCast TV 2013televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:25 | by ThaDafinser