User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ME302C Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.65583

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMeMO Pad FHD 10Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMeMO Pad FHD 10tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.2.2AsusME302Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 16.0Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2AsusMemoPad FHD 10tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 4.2AsusME302CTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:25 | by ThaDafinser