User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; GoogleTV 3.2; TI320-DU Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Safari/534.24

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 11.0WebKit Google TV 3.2GoogleGoogleTVtvyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeGoogleTV 3.2GoogleTVcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Google TV LGU+ tv Gtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux i686 GoogleTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:26 | by ThaDafinser