User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (MOT-XT800/TITA_M2_16.22.7;U;Android/2.1-update1;480*854;CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1MotorolaXT800smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid 2.1.0MotorolaXT800closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1MotorolaMOTO XT800mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:27 | by ThaDafinser