User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4; G Watch R Build/KNX01R) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) WIB/0.9.8 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4yes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4closeAndroid 4.4G Watch Rcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Wear Internet Browser 0.9.8Webkit 537.36Android Wear LGG Watch Rwatchyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:27 | by ThaDafinser