User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.53 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1750.31 (Edition beta)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 28.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1750.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 28.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1750closeMac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Beta 28.0Blink 537.36OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeMac OS X 10.10.1Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:29 | by ThaDafinser